logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.03.09 2015고단67
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution at the Suwon District Court for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2014, and is currently under suspended execution.

1. The Defendant, even though there is no intention or ability to sell an article, did not have the intention or ability to sell the article, in order to acquire the price of the article from the victims who reported and contacted the article on the Internet.

On September 28, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the residence of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant would send a cell phone to the victim D, who reported and contacted the fact that he would deposit the price with the victim D, by accessing the galthal unit (htp:/www.b.unjang) which is a direct trade site of used goods of the Internet, would sell galthal unit (htp) and selling galthalthal, which is a mobile phone.

However, the defendant did not have the above mobile phone and even if he was paid the sales proceeds from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 260,00 as sales proceeds through the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant, from the victim, and received KRW 520,000 in total by deceiving the victims four times in the same manner as shown in the attached crime list.

2. On October 19, 2014, around 20:00 on October 20, 2014, the Defendant cut off one resident registration certificate owned by the victim, which was located on the part of the victim F in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by taking advantage of the gap in the victim F's cresh in the victim F's cresh in the victim's cresh.

3. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document is an official document in possession of the same circumstance as the written in paragraph (2), who was requested by I to present an identification card to verify his/her identity, while he/she intended to purchase a mobile phone at the H’s cell phone sales store located in Ischeon-si G.

arrow