logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.06.11 2019고단3
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The five members of the Trade Union belonging to B demanded the full-time establishment of the fixed-term CCTV control personnel belonging to C Si from October 30, 2018 to October 19:00 of the same month, and demanded a three market interview by taking out the market office of the second floor of D located D from October 30, 2018 to October 19:00 of the same month. The five members of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Commission, who were 100 members of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Commission belonging to B, occupy the C viewing channel from October 30, 2018 to 18:00 of the above reasons.

C Around November 19, 2018, after the occurrence of the foregoing situation, the Si listens to the news that B intends to hold the “B Total Frequency Resolution” in front of the C audience, and formulates an office building protection plan in accordance with the rules on implementation of the Security Business Regulations, which is the Ministry of the Interior and Safety Directive, and the C City Security Business Rule, and sent to the headquarters of the North Korean region on the 20th day of the same month a letter to the effect that B would not use internal toilets at the time of the resolution of the B Total Frequency Business, and use a portable toilet installed near the place of assembly report, and that B received it.

피고인은 2018. 11. 21. 15:00경 D에 있는 C시청 앞 노상에서 개최된 ‘B 총파업 결의대회’에 E노조 포항지부 조합원으로 참가하여 시위하면서 사회자로부터 C시에서 시청 내부의 화장실을 이용하지 말고 집회신고 장소 인근에 설치된 간이 화장실을 이용하라고 요구한다는 말을 전해 들었음에도, 청사 내부에 있는 화장실을 이용할 생각으로 같은 날 16:55경 C시청 현관 출입문 안으로 들어가려다가 위 청사 방호계획에 따라 청사를 방호 중이던 C시청 자치행정과 총무계 소속 F로부터 제지를 당하게 되자 화가 나 “좀 쓰자, 씨발”이라고 욕설을 하면서 손바닥으로 위 F의 빰을 2회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the above F's office building protection.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1.A report - A copy of the present status of receipt of the report for assembly;

arrow