logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.29 2019가합500975
유류분반환청구의 소
Text

The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The family relations, etc. of the networkO (hereinafter referred to as "the network") married with the network P, and had the network Q Q, net R, Plaintiff A, B, C, and D as their children.

The network Q married with Defendant E and had Defendant G, I, J, and K as their children.

After the network R died on January 31, 1995, the Defendant M (name before the change: S) and N (name before the change) filed a lawsuit against the prosecutor under the Seoul Family Court 95D56266, which declared on December 7, 1995 that “Defendant M and N are the natural parents of the network,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

The deceased died on January 23, 2007, and the deceased died on February 8, 201, and the deceased Q died on August 2018.

Attached Form

The ownership transfer registration of each real estate listed in the list and gift-related net Q, on July 21, 198, has been completed with respect to each real estate listed in [Attachment List Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) on July 11, 198, due to sale and purchase on July 11, 198.

On October 209, the Deceased donated on October 20, 2009, the real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the attached list (hereinafter “second real estate of this case”) to the deceased Q, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 22, 2009 with respect to the above real estate by reason of the above donation to the net Q.

On January 20, 2011, the Deceased donated 1/3 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 4 (hereinafter “instant 3 real estate”) to Defendant L, M, and N, and the transfer registration for shares based on the said gift was completed on January 21, 201 to Defendant L, M, and N on January 20, 201.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 20, and 21 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply). The plaintiff's assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings is the donation of each of the real estate of this case to the deceased Q Q and defendant L, M, and N.

arrow