A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who belongs to “D” construction site located in the Incheon Metropolitan City, from February 1, 2015 to January 2016, and from February 2016 to October 20, 2016, to the victim F Co., Ltd. at the scene of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and was in charge of accounting, such as management of human resources at construction site, payment of personnel expenses, etc.

The defendant did not confirm the current status of human resources invested in the construction site of this case by the victim company and intended to acquire money by falsely claiming labor expenses for workers who do not actually work using the circumstances that pay labor expenses according to the contents requested by the defendant.

1. The Defendant committed the crime from August 2015 to January 7, 2016 at the scene of “D” located in Incheon City, Incheon, City, Do around August 8, 2015: (a) filed a claim for false labor costs with the victim company as if G had actually worked in spite of the fact that G had actually worked in the said construction site; (b) had the victim company deposit the amount corresponding to H, a service company, and (c) had the victim company deposit the amount equivalent to KRW 324,00,000, which was excessively counted from the above H, with the Defendant’s spouse transferred the amount equivalent to KRW 324,00 to the bank account in the name of the Defendant’s spouse from January 7, 2016, through the same method as the Defendant’s list of crimes (1) in the same manner as the last six times in total.

2. On May 30, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime from around April 2016 to August 2016 of the same year was transferred to the Defendant’s spouse’s spouse’s bank account from around September 13, 2016 to September 13, 2016, including: (a) the Defendant claimed false labor costs from the victim company as if he actually worked despite the fact that J and K had not actually worked at the said construction site; and (b) the Defendant had the victim company deposit money in the said H; and (c) the Defendant transferred the amount equivalent to KRW 1,625,00,000, which is the amount appropriated from the above H, to the Defendant’s spouse’s bank account.