logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.12 2019나52799
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The revised part 3 pages 16 of the 19th Amendment "2.2" is deemed to be "3.3. Determination."

It is reasonable to say that the 4th 24th 24th e.g., “this case’s lease agreement is terminated during the term of lease, and thus, Article 10-4 of the Commercial Building Lease Act does not apply.”

5 pages 3, the term “the instant lease agreement” is deemed to be the term “the instant lease agreement.”

The 5th page 9’s conclusion is “4. conclusion”.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is reasonable.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow