All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants (Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendants acknowledged each of the crimes of this case as well as their depth and reflects on the fact that the defendants were found to have committed each of the crimes of this case under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant Eul presented a written application to the effect that the victim F does not want to be punished against the above defendants. In addition, the above defendants deposited KRW 3 million to the victim J of the bodily injury, KRW 200,000 for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, KRW 3 million for the victim H and I, and KRW 200,000 for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties. The defendant Eul was punished only for the crime of negligence, and even in the case of the defendant Eul, only two times for the crime of obstruction of official duties, even though there was the history of punishment once for the injury crime, the defendants committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly due to several violence crimes, the degree of damage to the victim of the crime of injury to the defendant, the defendant's new motive for the crime of obstruction of official duties and the changes in the circumstances of the above defendants, etc.

Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is justified.