1. The Defendant collects the trees planted on the E forest land E 1,630 square meters above ground in leisure with the Plaintiffs and collects the above land.

In full view of Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, and 5-1, and Gap evidence 3-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant can recognize the fact that he arbitrarily planted trees on the land of 1,630 square meters of E forest land at the time of leisure city owned by the plaintiffs, and there is no reflective proof, and the defendant has a duty to collect the trees on the above land and deliver the above land to the plaintiffs.

Therefore, it is decided as per Disposition by admitting the plaintiffs' claims for reasons.