The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged by the Defendant is that at around 14:00 on Nov. 25, 1975, in the restaurant room for D management located in the Dam Chang-gun C market in the former North Chang-gun, Chang Chang-gun, the Defendant would not dump gold because of the government’s control of gold in spring for a life.

“To the end,” and “to the end,”

If the decline of a farmer in the government falls off, a person in an agricultural community who is not likely to reduce the gold shall be unable to live;

It is essential that rural communities will be subject to the German financial value in several years, and Bosia;

without title, the politics of this country will become a sole financial tribunal;

In Korea, Ngrgn had his house, but caused taxes to be collected during the 2nd 3st 2nd 3st , thereby spreading a distorted fact to the contrary.

2. Progress of this case

A. On March 26, 1976, the Defendant was indicted for the Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch of Eup, and the above court found the Defendant guilty of the charges as above, and rendered a judgment imposing two years of suspended execution and suspension of qualifications for one year by applying Articles 7 and 1(a) of the Presidential Emergency Decree (hereinafter “Emergency Measure No. 9”) for the protection of national security and public order (hereinafter “Emergency Measure No. 9”), and the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended execution and suspension of qualifications for one year (hereinafter “the judgment subject to a retrial”). The Prosecutor appealed against this, but the judgment subject to a retrial was dismissed on July 14, 1976 and became final and conclusive thereafter.

B. On October 20, 2017, a prosecutor filed a request for a retrial against a judgment subject to a retrial. On December 7, 2017, this court rendered a decision to commence a retrial on the ground that there was a ground that there was a ground for re-examination under Article 420 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act in the judgment subject to a retrial, and the said decision to commence a retrial became final and conclusive on the ground that no legitimate

3. Determination

A. The President with respect to the emergency power of the State, which is exercised to ensure the existence of the State, in the event of a serious crisis that is unable to cope with by the exercise of power in accordance with the constitutional order at the time of peace of the unconstitutionality of Emergency Decree No. 9.