beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,679,00 for Plaintiff A and 6% per annum from April 1, 2015 to January 17, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status of the parties concerned is an individual entrepreneur who engages in construction machinery leasing business, etc. under the trade name of “D”, and Plaintiff B is an individual entrepreneur who engages in construction machinery leasing business, etc. under the trade name of “E”, and the Defendant is a corporation that engages in construction business, etc.
On the other hand, the plaintiff A is a non-registered director of the defendant and served as the field director.
B. Plaintiff A’s equipment lease1) The Defendant requested Plaintiff A to lease construction sites, G hotel construction sites, and H construction sites at an elevated level between F the Defendant’s construction work site and H construction sites, and the Plaintiff A leased construction equipment, such as 25kW compact showers, at the aforementioned construction site from October 21, 2014 to March 31, 2015 (hereinafter “instant equipment lease agreement”).
(2) On January 5, 2015, the Plaintiff issued and issued the following tax invoices as a person who is supplied with the Defendant at KRW 3,63,000,000, KRW 400,000, KRW 400,000, KRW 400,000, KRW 11,616,000, KRW 116,000,000, KRW 11,616,000, KRW 33,330,000, KRW 33,63,000,000, KRW 19,679,000, KRW 20,000, KRW 319,679,000, KRW 1,000.
C. Plaintiff A’s claim for false gas supply costs and criminal punishment 1) against the Defendant, while the Defendant concluded a transit supply contract with K operating the “J gas station” located in Pakistan at the time of Pakistan, and the above gas station provided the transit required for the above construction equipment at the above station (the name of the business operator of the above gas station was L, but the actual after-sales acts was done by K.
2) However, K and Plaintiff A presented a false amount of flow that is higher than the actual amount of flow when K demanded the Defendant to pay the amount of oil, and received more than the actual amount of flow, and offered to Plaintiff A a bid by purchasing the note with the money.
3 In accordance with the above public offering, K presents a false prime flow to the Defendant from July 2013 to December 2014.