beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on November 2, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Busan Correctional Institution on November 2, 2012.
[2013 Highest 7353] On September 20, 2013, the Defendant ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol in the Emina bank operated by the victim D (year 35) located in Busan Jin-gu C, Busan (age 35).
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value even if he was provided with alcoholic beverage and speech from the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had been provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 2.10,000 from the victim.
[2014 Highest 382] On December 23, 2013, the Defendant entered the “H musical shop” operated by the injured party G in Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, as if he would pay the drinking value, and ordered the injured party to drink, etc.
However, there was no intention or ability of the defendant to pay the drinking value even if the defendant was provided with alcohol from the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 322,50,00 at the market price from the victim’s seat.
[2014 Highest 582] On January 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) entered the Knonok branch operated by the injured party J on the part of Busan, Busan, on the part of the injured party J on January 23:40, 2014; (b) as if he had no intent or ability to pay the price, he would normally pay the price; and (c) ordered the injured party’s drinking; and (d) was provided with alcoholic beverages worth KRW 200,000 in the market value from the injured party’s seat.
[2014 Highest 1131] The Defendant, around 16:00 on January 19, 2014, ordered the purchase price to be paid normally from the Nhop operated by the victim M in Busan Seo-gu L, and ordered the purchase price to be paid normally. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the purchase price.
In other words, the defendant is against the victim.