logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.07.04 2018가합204200 (1)
집행판결
Text

1. The 11th judicial tour court of the U.S. Pluda-U.S. Pluda Round Round 11, 2017

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. In the case of the plaintiffs and the defendant, C, and D trading companies (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant, etc."), the 11th judicial tour court 2017-01975-CA-01, the 11th judicial tour court of the United States, the defendant, etc. accused by deceiving the plaintiffs, etc. to obtain 90,000 U.S. dollars, and the 321,258.09 US dollars in compensation for damages, etc., the above court rendered a judgment on December 12, 2017 that "the defendant, etc. shall pay the plaintiffs the 10,826.96 US dollars in compensation for damages, etc., the 321,258.09 US dollars in compensation for damages, etc., the sum of US dollars 32,085.05 US dollars in compensation for damages, etc., and the 47.75% interest per annum from December 13, 2017 to the date of full payment."

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant protocol”). B.

Therefore, the plaintiffs are seeking to permit compulsory execution based on the judgment of the Ririju in this case, since the judgment of the Ririju meets all the requirements stipulated in Article 217 of the Civil Procedure Act for the approval of a foreign judgment.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;

3. Part of rejection

A. Whether recognition of a final judgment, etc. by a foreign court is contrary to the good morals and other social order of the Republic of Korea as a result of the final judgment, etc. of the foreign court’s recognition should be determined in light of the case where the final judgment has dealt with the basic moral belief and social order that the domestic law intends to protect and the final judgment, etc

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Da1284, Oct. 15, 2015). Article 217-2(1) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “The court shall make a final and conclusive judgment, etc. on compensation for damages to the basic order of the international treaty concluded by the Republic of Korea

arrow