1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff extended KRW 33,40,000 to the Defendant, who is the Plaintiff, to whom the Plaintiff had claimed, agreed to pay KRW 25 million out of the borrowed money, by succeeding to the Plaintiff the claim for refund of KRW 25,00,000,000,000,000,000, which the Defendant had been living with women-friendly C (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

However, C demanded the lessor of the apartment of this case to return the deposit of KRW 25 million and the Plaintiff was unable to refund the deposit of KRW 25 million from the lessor.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 25 million equivalent to the above rental deposit.

2. The following facts are revealed, without any dispute over the judgment, Gap evidence 2 and Eul evidence 3-2's overall purport and arguments. In other words, the former lessee of the apartment of this case was not the defendant, but his woman-friendly C, and also his claim for the refund of the lease deposit belongs to Eul, and thus there is no evidence to deem that Eul's consent or consent existed in order to receive the succession of the claim for the refund of the lease deposit of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of 25 million won as the remainder of the lease deposit amount of 25 million won. If the plaintiff succeeded to the claim for the refund of the lease deposit of 25 million won as the repayment of the existing loan to the defendant of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case.

3. Conclusion.