The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the fact that the Defendant committed the instantless driving in spite of the past records of punishment (six times a fine and two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment) due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., a fine) or the violation of the Road Traffic Act (i., a violation of the former Road Traffic Act (i.e., a violation of the Road Traffic Act (i., a violation of the Act), and (ii) a violation of the Road Traffic Act (ii).

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Prosecutor, the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided and reflected, and the crime of this case is not the Defendant caused a traffic accident due to the operation of this case, the Defendant does not commit the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution, and the Defendant is going not to repeat again, and the Defendant’s character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, the background and result of the crime of this case, and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered to be unjustifiable, and thus, the Prosecutor’s allegation above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.