Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the Defendant’s state provided education and business registration, and the Defendant’s instant act was merely administered by the competent authorities for recovery from exposure, and the fact that it is not medical practice, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Under the Medical Service Act, no person, other than a medical person, is allowed to perform medical practice without being accredited as a massage, and a massage rider is allowed to perform any commercial activity without being accredited as a massage, and it is difficult to see that there is a justifiable ground to mislead misunderstanding that prior acts of another institution are not a crime solely on the ground that he/she trusted another institution's prior acts, and the "brine" under Article 82 (1) of the Medical Service Act is "a variety of finger-out methods such as massage, mathy, flading, cutting, cutting, or cutting, etc. with a hand or special apparatus for the purpose of improving national health, or using an electrical apparatus in accordance with other self-dive methods, such as the use of a dynasium, etc., and thus, he/she shall be allowed to fill to the extent that he/she has laid down, cut, etc., his/her face by promoting the use of blood circulation, etc., and the defendant is not limited to the acts that may cause harm to public health and sanitation (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do57, May 2014, etc.).