A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 1, 2011, the Defendant stated that “The Construction Corporation for the Establishment of the Gyeonggi-do Ethical Social Pidi, which has the 18% equity interest in the Construction Work, ordered to do electrical construction of KRW 100 billion, and it is expected to start on March 201, the Defendant would allow the victims to perform CCTV construction ordered at KRW 18.5 billion if he/she seeks a corporate business operator,” and said, through the chairperson of Eth, the Defendant was working as a person capable of enabling the victims to be able to receive CCTV construction during the construction of the ethic social tethic Social Pidi.

Accordingly, victims came into contact with each of their corporate entities and started preparation for construction work, and victims D introduced multi-Korean corporation corporation to be a corporate entity that will work together, and the defendant provided business explanation to the above company and introduced multi-Korean CCTV corporation 18.5 billion won CCTV corporation.

1. Around February 10, 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C that “Additional CCTV Corporation ordered 16 billion won in connection with the Red Social Pidio Corporation. It would allow the business entity to accept a subcontract for 16 billion won from the Eth Association on the ground that the business entity would be able to receive a subcontract for the 16 billion won from the Eth Association, and the head of E, the ordering entity, who is the ordering entity, should have his/her personnel work up to prepare cash.”

However, there was no intention or ability of the president to accept a subcontract for the 16 billion won electrical construction among the tetetetetetetetetetetetetetetetetetetete E, so the defendant did not have any intent or ability to allow the victim to accept a subcontract for the aforementioned tetetetetetetetetetete E.

The Defendant received from the victim the total sum of KRW 3 million around February 17, 201, and KRW 14 million around March 10, 201, from the victim as teaching expenses, and acquired it by fraud.

2. The victim D.