logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.07.03 2014고정240
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of one-year imprisonment with labor for forging private documents in the Jeonju District Court's Military Accounting Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 3, 2013.

1. Crimes of fabrication under B on September 28, 2012;

A. On September 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent a copy of the resident registration certificate B purchased from E on September 28, 2012 by facsimile to F; (b) on September 28, 2012, the Defendant: (c) sent the copy of the resident registration certificate in the name of E purchased from E in the name of E in the name of E in the name of E in the following cities: (d) “A request for the opening of the mobile phone so that he or she would open the mobile phone because he or she requested the opening of the mobile phone; and (e) let F or namelights know of such fact sign “B” in the name of the customer of the service contract and the sales contract of the mobile phone to be opened at H located in E in the following cities on September 28, 2012, stating “B”, “I” in the resident registration number column, and “B” in the name of B after the date of application” respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and a sales contract for a terminal.

B. On September 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around September 28, 2012, at the above H, had the F or a person in a name disorder submit a forged service contract and a sales contract for the terminal device to the SK Telecom employee who is aware of such forgery; and (b) exercised each of them as if they were duly constituted.

2. On September 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) forged a new service contract in the name of J and one copy of a contract to use a device in the name of J in the same manner as the foregoing paragraph (1) around September 28, 2012; and (b) committed each of them.

3. On October 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) forged a new service contract in the name of B and a single copy of a franchise contract to be installed in the same manner as the foregoing paragraph (1) on October 4, 2012; and (b) performed each of them.

4. The crime of fabrication under the J on October 4, 2012.

arrow