logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.22 2017고단2187
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 24, 2017, from around 23:00 to around 00:58 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force, such as: (a) calculating the drinking value, and making an employee E’s selling his/her arms at his/her employees’ request; (b) doing an act of having the customers who drink on the side table to drink and drink, thereby having the customers throw the alcohol and drink, thereby obstructing the victim’s business operation by force.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, received a report, and received a request for withdrawal from the victim G, who was a policeman belonging to the F District, who was dispatched to the Republic of Korea, and his/her employees and visitors, made a public insult of the victim by “in the event there are employees and visitors, he/she publicly insulted the victim by referring to the victim to “the victim’s flusium, flusium, and brusium.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A complaint filed for G production;

1. Investigation report (as for item E and H telephone conversations, respectively);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (as to the analysis of images taken by on-site police officers);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The duration and degree of interference with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be considered, the degree of insult, the defendant's previous conviction relation, etc.

arrow