1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(1) The defendant's issuance of a warning to the defendant is merely an act of notifying the parties to the purchase contract, and it cannot be deemed an "act of public authority of the administrative agency" as it is merely an act of notifying the parties to the purchase contract, and it is merely an intermediate disposition that does not directly affect the rights and obligations of the plaintiff and thus does not constitute an "legal act that directly affects the rights and obligations of the people", and thus, it does not constitute an administrative disposition that is subject to appeal litigation. 2. Accordingly, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus it is dismissed. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is just as the conclusion, and thus,