1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On December 11, 2013, the Plaintiff agreed to sell each of the instant lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) to the Defendant for KRW 200 million. Of the purchase price, KRW 20 million, an intermediate payment of KRW 90 million, “within three months after the completion of civil engineering works,” and the remainder of KRW 90 million, in repayment of documents and reimbursement necessary for the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The Plaintiff received KRW 20 million from the Defendant on December 9, 2013 and the same month on December 10, 2013, and received KRW 20 million from the Defendant’s wife, as well as KRW 30 million on January 29, 2014, the same year.

4. 23.10 million won received each remittance;

On August 14, 2015, Defendant 1 appears to be a clerical error in the “salvout” of the contract strike on August 14, 2015.

I, as follows:

On August 25, 2015, 2010. 8. 201

지도요도요 도요

on August 28, 2015, the payment of the amount of interest accrued on August 28, 2015 is required.

Land taken over on September 17, 2015

I would like to know the match.

Lastly sees,

It is difficult to say that I will face the currency of the Ampha Hospital at present.

Until now the interest has been refunded

September 20, 2015,도요 for liaison

After the completion of counseling, the telephone urrypted office is opened, and now 4th day of September 24, 2015, the 4th day of May 2015.

(2) If the payment is made, it is necessary to know that the payment is made.

도요 to request the morning on September 25, 2015 to be deposited in September 25, 2015

At the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiff: (a) ordered the civil engineering works for each of the instant lands to D, the constructor; (b) had been delayed due to increase in the construction cost.

Accordingly, the defendant mentioned the reversal of the sales contract of this case around July and August 2015.

The same year from August 14, 2015 to the same year

9. The main contents of the mobile phone messages between the Plaintiff and the Defendant from the end of 25th, are as follows:

On the other hand, C, who is the defendant, has no dispute, Gap No. 3, witness E's testimony and the purport of the whole pleading.