A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:00 on June 25, 2015, the Defendant, at the “E” restaurant operated by D in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, ordered the Defendant’s wife F with the Defendant’s wife, and obstructed the restaurant business by having other customers and employees take a bath, etc. under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officers’ crime prevention and investigation, such as plucking and plucking of H with his arms and fingers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to H;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004 and two times before and after a fine for 2007 due to drunk driving, and the Defendant appears to have paid KRW 4.50,00 to the victimized police officers for the recovery of damage) (the scope of recommending punishment) [the scope of recommending punishment] that there is no basic area (6 to one year and four months), the basic area (6 to one year and four months), [a person who has a special person] [a sentence] [a sentence]