A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant, around 02:07, driven the front road in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, by drinking alcohol in the direction of a luminous terminal from the direction of the luminous direction, while driving XG car, he was driven by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol to the Defendant from a slope G, who belongs to the police box of the Seoul Seo-gu Police Station in the emergency room at the above hospital at around 03:04 on the same day, and driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol to the Defendant by drinking alcohol, reding, and drinking alcohol.

Due to reasonable grounds, there was a demand for responding to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 15 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to take a drinking test and failed to comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 5217" is a driver of an E-chip and XG car.

On April 6, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content 0.171% in blood transfusion 0.6.02:35, and led the Defendant to the two-lanes between the two-lanes in the Geumcheon-si 2:50 per annum, treatment apartment, and the road adjacent to treatment apartment, from the offside of the Gae apartment, to the offside of the gold park.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to ensure that the driver is able to make a U-turn and left turn on a one-lane, and that the driver has a duty of care to ensure that the driver is able to proceed in line with the proceeding lane, to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right, and to accurately manipulate

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting the influence of alcohol, was able to turn to the left at a two-lane due to the negligence of the U.S., and the victim H (28 S) who was driven by the Defendant, the upper part of the front part of the I Lasta vehicle, which was driven by the victim H(28 S), was the upper part of the upper part of the XG vehicle, and the lower part of the upper part of the XG vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the above occupational negligence.