A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant, without registering with the Mineyang City Mayor, opened a news report room under the trade name “D” from B’s B’s studio C, from around May 26, 2020 to around May 26, 202. The Defendant was provided with KRW 30,000 per hour from an employee who has provided entertainment services for about 10 hours, using the names of “E”, “F”, “G”, etc., waiting for the said office, or going to board for a Hststet or other car, and arranging the customer to receive KRW 30,000 per hour from the owner, etc. of an entertainment shop, etc. for at least four hours per day, and was provided with KRW 10,00 from an employee who has provided entertainment services for less than four hours as a broker.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register with the competent authorities and provided a fee job placement service.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement I in court and each police statement before J;

1. Report on internal investigation in K and L respective written statements (the act of providing a person suspected of being suspected of being suspected) - Data of photographs;

1. As a result of digital evidence analysis, the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to cover the suspect’s text messages related to the provision of the suspect’s text messages, photographic materials, and transaction books and photographs;

1. Article 47 subparagraph 1 of the relevant Act and Articles 47 and 19 (1) of the Act on the Stabilization of Employment and Stability of Punishment for Criminal Facts, and Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, which could have been invalidated under Article 62-2 of the same Act, even though the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7,00,000 on July 17, 2017 for the same type of crime, it is very negative that repeating the instant crime is very negative.

However, in full view of the fact that the defendant shows the attitude of reflecting his mistake, the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding a fine, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, criminal history, circumstances after the crime, results, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered.