Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-L car.

On June 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 11:10 and led to the turn to the left from the side of the public playground to the military medical center.

Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by proceeding with the person engaged in driving service according to the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left at the right edge of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the negligence of failing to do so, and led the victim C (50) who is driving to turn to the left from the right edge of the public playground at the Gunsan Office of Education to the right edge of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the chilling tensions requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment on the part of the victim E (V, 41 years old) of the affected vehicle, and inflicted injury on the victim E (V, 74 years old) of the damaged vehicle, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the chilling chills requiring approximately 3 weeks of treatment on the victim F (V, 74 years old) of the damaged vehicle, and inflicted injury on the victim G (V, 78 years old) of the damaged vehicle with approximately 6 weeks of treatment, on the part of the victim G (V, 78 years old) of the damaged vehicle with no physical wound in which approximately 6 weeks of treatment is required for approximately 14 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs and black stuff photographs of a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the term "victim H" with the largest number of crimes).