Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle for Bsch Rexton.

On November 6, 2019, at around 08:39, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and proceeded directly from D to E apartment in the direction of the direction of the sub-section 3.

There are roads where traffic is not controlled, and crosswalks were installed in the front bank.

In such cases, when a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle reduces the speed, well sees the front left well, and pedestrians walk the crosswalk, he/she has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk to check the safety of pedestrians first and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and is proceeding directly.

The victim F(9), who has cross the crosswalk from the right side to the left side, did not find out the victim F(9,00) and turned the victim's body part into the front part of the victim's vehicle.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim's negligence in the course of business to suffer from a ductal aggregate that requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement, actual condition survey, report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, field photographs, written statements, diagnosis certificates, the ledger of driver's license for automobiles, car inquiry, and certificate of insurance coverage for automobiles;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the case is that the crime is not good due to traffic accidents against the child crossinging the crosswalk, that there is no criminal agreement with the victim, that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, that there are circumstances to consider the circumstances of the accident, and that the vehicles are covered by the comprehensive insurance.