logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.10 2013가합562667
한정채무부존재확인의 소
Text

1. On December 27, 2012, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is located in the upper part of the Cski ground Cki ground located in Chuncheon City, B around 22:00.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 22:00 on December 27, 2012, the Defendant, at the time of the instant skiing ground operated by the Plaintiff, was getting a skiing along with his/her daughters from the Furmasl.

B. D, a skiing instructor belonging to the Plaintiff, took a training course for college students, and skids and skids and skids and skids followed by the Defendant:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Defendant suffered injuries, such as the left-hand pelpel, pelto, peltothal pelto, peltothal pelto, ladneal pel, trinealalal damage, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul evidence 3-3, 5, 6, 9, and 10; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the Defendant’s above recognition of the Defendant’s liability for damages, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 5 (including the number of branch numbers), witness Eul’s testimony, the result of the Defendant’s questioning, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as follows, D, a skiing instructor, was negligent in neglecting his/her duty of care to prevent collision with other people through the proper change of direction and operation, and therefore, D, an employer, is liable to compensate the Defendant for damages caused by the instant accident pursuant to Article 756 of the Civil Act, in accordance with Article 756 of the Civil Act.

① At the time of the instant accident, there is no dispute as to the fact that the Defendant was at the lower end of the slot, but with regard to the circumstances, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant’s face and DNA face conflicted in the course of the Defendant’s opening of the Gurmasst, and that the Defendant’s face conflicted from D with the surf.

② D stated that the instant accident suffered a heat at the outer 1st century and the outer knife of 2 knife, knife, knife, and knife of knife. This was the Defendant’s knife of knife on the face.

arrow