1. The defendant received on September 25, 1992 from the Incheon District Court Branch with regard to the real estate stated in the attached list from the plaintiff.

1. As to the real estate indicated in the attached list owned by the plaintiff on September 25, 1992, the fact that the registration of creation of chonsegwon (hereinafter referred to as the "registration of creation of chonsegwon of this case") was completed on the basis of No. 58430, which was received on September 25, 1992 by the Incheon District Court Branch of the Incheon District Court, as the maximum debt amount of KRW 24,00,000,000, the debtor, the creditor, and the creditor, and the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage of this case") under Article 58431, which was received on the same day, was completed by the plaintiff and the defendant, respectively.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. On September 25, 1992, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) borrowed KRW 15,00,000 from the Defendant to secure the above loan loan claim; and (b) completed the registration of the establishment of a mortgage and the establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis on a deposit basis; (c) however, the Plaintiff fully repaid the loan to the Defendant; (d) the Defendant is obligated to cancel the registration of the establishment of a mortgage and the right to lease on a deposit basis on a deposit basis

Even if the above loan has expired by prescription, the defendant is obligated to cancel each of the above registration to the plaintiff.

B. The defendant's assertion completed the establishment registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis of this case in order to lend KRW 16,00,000 to the plaintiff and secure this, and paid KRW 10,000,000 as the deposit for lease on a deposit basis, and completed the registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis. In the case of the loan of KRW 16,00,000,000, the plaintiff paid only interest on the loan, and the maturity period has not been expired since the loan was extended due to the extension of the maturity period. Since the plaintiff did not deliver the real estate listed in the attached list to the defendant and did not set the expiration period of the right to claim the return of the deposit on a deposit basis

C. We examine the judgment, first of all, the Plaintiff borrowed money to the Defendant.