Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as a police official belonging to the High Public Police Station, from January 23, 2017 to the same year.

9. A person who, up to 21.21., performed the duty of acting as a captain of a police box located in Category C, and the victim E (the victim E) is a person in the position of F Round, from around 2012 to around F Round.

The Defendant, at around 18:30 on September 15, 2017, attended a meeting of the F Myeon head of F Myeon, who attended a meeting of call and a meeting of call at the meeting of 22 persons, including the Defendant and the injured party, at a “H” restaurant located in G, and provided meals, the Defendant would have to make a report to the chief of the police station on his/her own to the F Myeon.

For the reason that she was faced with gambling, she had a good appraisal for the victim.

At around 20:00 on the same day, the Defendant, upon the recommendation of K of the former F Myeon, joined the victim in the second drinking place in the said event with the victim, and thereby the victim “I am feasia and quid pro quo.”

“In doing so, Maer’s disease (330 l.m.) was collected, which is a dangerous object on the table, and threatened the victim who was seated on the table, with a view to facing the table.

The Defendant continued to 21:15 on the same day, while singing at the above place, “this kind of gue is the victim.”

“In doing so, as it is called “,” a dangerous object cited by the Defendant (22 cm in length, 5 cm in diameter) had a threat of putting the victim into the head, as the victim faces.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened each victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, L, M, and N;

1. The part that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case among each of the aforementioned witnesses’ respective legal statements made by each of the above witnesses to determine the issues of the suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendant, in particular, the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, and the participants at the time are the Defendant and the victim.