logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.14 2016누81101
난민불인정결정취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding a judgment to this court as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, as the grounds for appeal by this Court, the Plaintiff’s additional decision in this Court is the reason for appeal, that “if the Plaintiff returns to Ghana, the Plaintiff is a nationality country, and there is a very high risk of persecution from the family reliance on Islamic intercourse on the ground that the Plaintiff was married to Germany, and therefore, there is sufficient fear that the Plaintiff would be persecution.”

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court. However, the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justifiable even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was examined in addition to the evidence (Evidence A5) submitted in this court.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.

arrow