logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.20 2017고단5242
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) around July 201, the victim D of the victim D at C University located in B in the Nam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) the victim prepared to appoint her husband E as professor at F University; and (c) the preparation cost for appointment is required.

It stated that if only appointment is made, the payment will be made in full.

However, at the time, the Defendant paid 7 million won as interest per month on the part of financial institutions as well as personal debts, and the income of the Defendant’s English private teaching institute was in excess of its expenditure, and there was uncertainty as to whether E is actually employed as a professor of F University. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Around July 13, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the damaged party to the account in the name of G, KRW 10 million to the account in the name of H, and KRW 10 million to the account in the name of H, and received KRW 30 million to the account in the name of E around August 31, 201, and received KRW 30 million from the account in the name of E on November 25, 201, and received KRW 10 million in cash and received KRW 100 million in total from the account in the name of E around November 25, 201.

2. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant was appointed as professor E by her husband to the victim at the place under the above paragraph (1).

A false statement was made that “I will immediately repay money when I lend money in need of living expenses.”

However, at the time, the Defendant paid 7 million won as interest per month on the part of financial institutions as well as personal debts, and the income of the Defendant’s English private teaching institute was in excess of its expenditure, and there was uncertainty as to whether E is actually employed as a professor of F University. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow