logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.05.12 2020고단29
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since the defendant is led to confession, it is necessary to make an additional statement on the same part as the relevant supporting evidence in the same way as “(see, e.g., the page of the evidence record).”

Based on evidence, the prosecutor's facts charged are modified to the extent that it does not adversely affect the defendant's right of defense and actually affect the contents of the facts charged, and it does not result in the change of the subject of trial by the court.

On December 12, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Chuncheon District Court on December 12, 2007.

(See Article 51 of the Evidence Records)

1. On October 11, 2019, around 04:49, the Defendant entering a structure, on the ground that “In front of the D apartment E-dong 1-2 Ra, which is the victim in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Kucheon-gun,” the Defendant: (a) intruded the structure managed by the victim, by entering the said apartment by using the cres emitted from the entrance, into the said apartment, and breaking the stairs over about 40 minutes; (b) thereby, the Defendant intruded the structure managed by the victim.

2. On October 11, 2019, the Defendant was driving a two-wheeled vehicle, i.e., a two-wheeled vehicle, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.193% (see, e.g., e., e., 9 pages) at around 05:45 on October 11, 2019, when the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.193% (see, e.g., e., see, e., e., see, e., evidence records) owned by the Defendant over a section of about 300 meters from the front of the above D apartment to the Hdong of

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

3. No person who violates the Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant is a motor vehicle that did not purchase mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, and I (see, e.g., evidence records No. 46).

arrow