Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in private taxi driving service BM5.

On August 11, 2014, at around 09:45, the Defendant driven the above taxi, and proceeded to the left by protecting the 190 long-term intersection from the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Gyeong-ro to the non-protection of the sublime distance.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving on the front side well sees the front side and the right of the road, and if a pedestrian passes the crosswalk, he/she has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the crosswalk, such as temporarily stopping in front of the crosswalk, so as not to obstruct or endanger the passage of the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is, the Defendant did not find out the victim C (the 70-year old age) who was towed by the hand-on signal from the left side of the course of the course to the right side of the pedestrian, and the way on the crosswalk was not found, and received the victim as the front left side of the taxi of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as an injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, on the part of the victim, who did not have two or more open situations in need of treatment for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Fact-finding report and report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Photographs of the accident site;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant confessions the crime of this case, the defendant is the primary offender, the vehicle operated by the defendant is affiliated with the private taxi mutual aid association, and other cases.