Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it is not likely that there is no actual disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defend, the facts constituting a crime shall be corrected and the facts charged are

Around 22:35 on August 27, 2011, when the Defendant driven a C Poter Cargo, and led the Defendant to proceed from the border border to the port of door. Since at night and without street lamps installed, the Defendant was at night, and the Defendant was at night at night at night, and the Defendant was obliged to take occupational care of the victim D (the 53 years old) who was stopped on the two-lane due to occupational negligence while driving the E Poter Cargo on the two-lane, and was negligent in performing the duty of care to accurately operate the steering and operating the steering gear, and thereby, the Defendant suffered from the victim D (the 53 years old) who was parked on the two-lane back of the said cargo due to the injury of the said victim, such as salt in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, injury of the said victim, injury of the said passenger, injury of the victim, 53 years old and 53 years old, and injury to the victim, 53 years old and 53 years old.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A comprehensive analysis of traffic accidents;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. On-site photographs at the time of each accident [the location of the accident is 200 meters connected to the direct line as the end of the section bend in the direction of the defendant's progress" (the investigation record 67 pages). The defendant found the damaged vehicle if the defendant fulfilled his/her duty of front-time evacuation. Nevertheless, it considerably conflicts with the damaged vehicle about about 27 meters by finding the damaged vehicle late and immediately stopping the damaged vehicle, the speed at the time of the defendant reached about 94km, and the damaged vehicle is considerably short of the distance immediately preceding the stopping.