logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.11.06 2014고정839
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 1363]

1. On July 20, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven without registration of 100C 20:00c, leading the road front of Jeju-si 6(Dried-dong) from the port of port to the modern apartment at the port of port.

In such a case, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving cars to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving a vehicle on the right side of the road at the time of the driver’s negligence, and the victim C (Y, 23 years old) was placed on the right side of the driver’s vehicle at D SPP as well as on the left side of the driver’s license.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the said car by occupational negligence, which is equivalent to KRW 721,358 of the repairing cost.

2. Around 20:00 on July 20, 2014, the Defendant driven a non-registration of about 100cm in the section of 1km from the road in front of the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as the holder of the above Oral Ba at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), operated the Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

[2014 High Court Decision 839]

1. Around 06:30 on July 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the G District by driving a 100 cc letobane from the front of the Defendant’s residence in Jeju-si to the front of the G District in Jeju-si, to the front of the G District in front of the G District in Jeju-si.

There are reasonable grounds to recognize that a person was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, smelling, gaing, etc. against the defendant from H in the position of this G District, he/she will respond to the measurement of drinking over three times from 06:50 to 07:16 on the same day.

arrow