The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

On September 16, 2010, the summary of the charges was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on September 25, 201 to one year and six months for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 25, 2010.

On April 30, 2007, the Defendant told the victim F to the effect that “The Defendant will undertake construction works to remodel the E hotel, and first lent KRW 100 million to lend it to the victim F at the E hotel 1st floor coffee shop located in Daegu Jung-gu.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed the above money from the victim, he did not have the ability to repay it, and he did not have the ability to provide the victim with a remodeling work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 100 million won from the victim to the account in the G name on the same day.

Judgment

On April 30, 2007, the fact that the defendant promised F to allow F to carry out remodeling works for the E hotel, and received KRW 100 million from F, can be recognized.

However, based on the evidence duly examined by this court, the following circumstances that can be recognized by this court, namely, ① the Defendant served as an adviser from around 2003 to the E hotel operated by H, who is a pilot in his company, and on March 2007, I received E hotel from H, who mainly remains in Seoul and has no experience in operating a hotel, and at the time, it was necessary to remodel the E hotel, so I asked the Defendant who has been involved in the operation of the former E hotel to delegate the overall hotel business and to promote remodeling work by advertising investors and selecting a public corporation. Ultimately, the Defendant cannot be deemed as not having been able to grant F the right to construct the E hotel. ② Although the Defendant transferred KRW 100,000 from F to his own account in the name of G, he used it as G’s business funds.