1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,000,000 as well as annual 5% from May 1, 2010 to July 10, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

1. The facts falling under any of the following subparagraphs may be found either as a dispute between the parties or as a whole by taking into account the respective entries and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4 (including each number, if any), and the whole purport of the pleadings:

The relevant Plaintiff is a small and medium enterprise consulting company specializing in management consulting for small and medium enterprises and support for small and medium enterprises, etc., and the Defendant is a project implementer who has promoted a general industrial complex development project in the area B B 142,610 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant project site”) on a site for manufacturing ships’ goods industry, machinery, plant, etc. (hereinafter “instant project site”).

B. (1) From November 2009, the Plaintiff established and implemented a general industrial complex development project plan on the instant project site, and started a review of the project target and a financial business plan in accordance with the said plan. On January 8, 2010, the Plaintiff made a request for the performance of civil engineering and design service work to Hansan Co., Ltd., and entered into a memorandum of understanding as to the establishment of the business zone zone with Hancheon-gu Co., Ltd., which is linked to the instant project site; consultation with the relevant administrative agency on the establishment of the business zone zone; ownership transfer on the parcel of land to be purchased; transfer of ownership; compensation for fishing village fraternities; settlement of disputes surrounding the project target area; and the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with the Defendant for the purpose of providing support for all matters related to the instant project promotion and efficient and efficient progress of the implementation procedure (hereinafter “instant service contract”). The main contents are as follows.

The contents and scope of Article 2 of the service contract of this case

1. Details of the services that the Plaintiff has to perform under this service agreement are as follows:

The review of the feasibility of services classified as services and the provision of information and consultation (consultation).