logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.13 2014고단119
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud of around May 7, 2009.

Reasons

The crime history of the crime (the fraud of the ice import business)

1. The Defendant and C conspired to acquire money from victims E by taking charge of the role of providing overseas investment advice in Indonesia as a hub, D is taking charge of conducting bail-import business in Africa.

On February 5, 2009, the F (determined to be acquitted on September 26, 2014) introduced the victim “an opportunity to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get off at the Gangnam bus Terminal located in the Seocho-gu Seoul distribution Dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and as a business entity that invested the Defendant in A, and as a person who provides overseas investment advice while working in a Korean company located in A, the Defendant and C respectively. The Defendant and C made a false statement to the victim that “the gold and release are entering Africa to Japan, and KRW 100 million is invested to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get to get off.”

However, the Defendant and D et al. did not have any intention or ability to purchase gold and release on bail, even if they did not receive investments from the victim because they did not actually conducted the release on bail in African Ghana.

In collusion with C and D, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 100,000,000 from the victim for the purpose of investment in bail income, and acquired the said money by fraud.

2. The prosecutor’s sole fraud prosecuted this part of the facts charged as “the crime of fraud by conspiracy with F” but the F was acquitted of this part of the facts charged and the judgment of innocence became final and conclusive on September 26, 2014.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2014Do7772). On February 13, 2009, the Defendant falsely stated, “The gold and release on bail, which the Defendant had to enter Africa, did not enter the schedule,” to the victim at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name in Seoul Sejong-ro 5, Seoul-ro, 209.”

arrow