logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.24 2014고단2026
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of larceny is acquitted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power that is a requirement for the aggravated punishment of habitual larceny】 The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for at night in Seoul District Court Southern Branch of the Seoul District Court on August 6, 2001 and two years of suspension of execution with prison labor for larceny at Seoul Central District Court on July 19, 201; and 201

4. The same year as he/she was sentenced to four months by imprisonment with prison labor for an attempted larceny at the Seoul Central District Court;

5.3. The execution of the sentence was completed.

【Around September 23:41, 2014, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact of the crime, around the Incheon Station, the front line of the Twit line (No. 1 line) and that surveillance was neglected due to a large number of passengers in the vicinity of the Incheon Station; (b) repeated the section between Dongam Station and Incheon Station; and (c) discovered that E was diving under the Diplomatic Line platform in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, the victim was under the influence of alcohol; and (d) accordingly, discovered that E was diving, the victim was under the influence of alcohol; and (e) took place, the market value of the victim, which is the victim’s possession, the Plaintiff 1 of the U.S. credit card company clicked, 476,000 won in the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Reports on internal investigation (the verification, etc. of a suspected criminal act), criminal scene, photographs using transportation cards, and investigation reports (related to the specific circumstances of the suspect);

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: A investigation report (report on the results of investigation into evidence), personal identification, case summary information inquiry, investigation report (Attachment to the previous judgment, the previous judgment, etc.), and criminal records (A) / [Attachment to the CCTV in which the offender steals the victim's mobile phone (in the investigation record, 38-45 pages, F, which is the cause of DNA service, has taken a look at CCTV images, and F, which has been carefully examined as a offender on the grounds of the offender's face, reputation, etc., were identified as an offender, and F, which is credibility on the grounds that the Defendant was identified as an offender.

arrow