A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and C subscribed to receive insurance money from the insurance company as if the accident occurred in the middle of each other, and as if the accident occurred in the middle of each other, the insurance company received the accident, and as if the accident occurred in the middle of each other, the insurance company would claim the most insurance money.

On July 10, 2012, at around 21:15, the Defendant received a traffic accident with the victim LIG damage insurance company as if there was a traffic accident, even though there was no sufficient fact that the Defendant was driving in front of the E-cafeteria in Kim Jong-si D while driving the Fone Star vehicle.

The defendant and C received KRW 968,550 from the victim for medical treatment and agreement.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, deceiving the victim, thereby deceiving the property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement C in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. G statements;

1. To issue an order to investigate a case suspected of gold reduction, driving insurance fraud, and to apply Acts and subordinate statutes to the documents to be submitted; and

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order (the sentencing guidelines do not apply because of the choice of a fine) is not good for the crime of this case, and the defendant has been punished once for the same crime. However, although the defendant is recognized to commit the crime of this case and the defendant is in depth divided, there is no profit gained by the defendant due to the crime of this case, and the defendant shows no profit gained by the crime of this case. The defendant has fully repaid the amount of damage to Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., and other records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, etc.