The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the sentence of the court below's sentence against the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Therefore, even when considering the favorable circumstances for the defendant such as the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and the victim does not want punishment against the defendant, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant by taking the face and body of the victim into consideration in order to escape from the payment of the drinking value, and thus, the crime of this case constitutes the crime of injury by robbery. The crime of this case is serious since it constitutes a crime of injury by robbery. The sentence of the court below is the lowest sentence that can be sentenced by reducing the statutory punishment for the crime of injury by robbery, other all kinds of sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court sentencing committee.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.