1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 4,142,857, and KRW 2,428,571 and KRW 2,428,571, respectively, to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) A and C.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) D (hereinafter “the deceased”).

(1) The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff, hereinafter “Defendant”) is the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Defendant”).

)The Seoul Jongno-gu University Hospital located in 101 Seoul Jongno-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”);

(B) In the case of the instant operation, the instant surgery is deemed to be performed by the following: (a) Haban tyrenal tyrenal tyrenal tyrenal and inter-patal inter-patal tyrenal tyrenal tyrenal and inter-patal ty

(2) The Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is the spouse and children of the Deceased.

3) On June 11, 2015, the Deceased is a medical treatment contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant medical treatment contract”).

The plaintiff A, a spouse, has concluded a contract and jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation of the deceased to pay medical expenses to the extent of KRW 30,000,000 in accordance with the special law for the protection of the guarantor. (b) The deceased's past medical personnel 1) was born on December 1945, and the deceased was a brain stroke and strokeic disease in around 2001, which was conducted stroke-dong and stroke-dong, and the stroke-dong strokecopic strokeic stroke around June 16, 2014.

In addition, the Deceased was suffering from high blood pressure and urology at the time of the instant surgery, and was in the use of the medicine with the symptoms of the strophical stropha, and from June 2014, the Deceased was under the treatment of stropha three times a week due to a terminal disease.

2) On February 22, 2015, the Deceased moved to an emergency room of the Defendant Hospital via E Hospital, after which he/she seems to have been fluencing on the chest on February 22, 2015. On February 24, 2015, the Deceased was released from the Defendant Hospital on the part of the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital. On February 25, 2015, the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel recommended the Deceased to conduct an additional examination, such as a blood tank CT examination, but wished to discharge the Deceased, and discharged the Deceased from the Defendant Hospital on February 25, 2015, with the result of a chronic confection of the Deceased on March 9, 2015.