Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2018, the Defendant was not kindly forced to pay taxi expenses and to return home from E in the situation where he belongs to the police station C District of the first police station in front of the first police station C District of the first police station located in Si B at Si of Seocho-si on July 19, 2018, with respect to the non-payment of the fee to D who is a taxi engineer.

At the same time, the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath, and the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the case, such as the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and D;

1. Application of statutes to CD-related to field video materials;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of a sentence, and the selection of a fine (including confession, reflectivity, and the fact that a police officer does not want the punishment of a defendant because the defendant committed a crime against a victimized police officer by a truth-finding)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. On July 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the front parking lot of the Seocho Police Station C District located in the Seocho-si, Sinsi-si, Sinsi-si; (b) and (c) on July 19, 2018, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly citing E the circumstances belonging to the Seocho Police Station C District of the first police station, where the victimized person was reported by the taxi engineer D, etc.: “I am why why she would dy, why she would dy, why she would fy, why she would fy, what she would fy, what she would fy, and what she would be fy, how he would fy, get on and off the taxi, or how she would fyp fyp fyp fy.”

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. The victim’s revocation of the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case.