A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around May 2012, the Defendant, along with C, received permission to engage in development activities, etc. from an acceptable viewing in order to create a site for neighboring residential sites and commercial buildings on land, etc. located in D, E, and in F, the wife population of the Republic of Korea owned by three persons, such as D, E, etc. from D, E, etc.

After accepting this, the Defendant and C promised to receive KRW 200 million on May 26, 2012 for obtaining permission, etc. to engage in development activities, such as the above land from D and E at an irregular place on the pretext of school expenses, design expenses, etc., and received KRW 5 million on the same day from the Defendant’s account, KRW 25 million on June 8, 2012, KRW 25 million on August 7, 2012, KRW 30 million on September 3, 2012, KRW 10 million on September 24, 2012, KRW 10 million on September 24, 2012, KRW 10 million on October 30, 2012, KRW 10 million on November 23, 2012, KRW 15 million on the same day.

On the other hand, around that time, the Defendant listened to the phrase “A need to make a large amount of money to public officials who want to obtain a large authorization and permission,” and issued KRW 76,50,000 from the Defendant’s corporate bank G account of the Defendant’s corporate bank to H account of the C Bank or KRW 76,50,000 in cash, on May 26, 2012.

As a result, the defendant received KRW 15 million under the pretext of solicitation or good offices in collusion with C, and delivered KRW 76.5 million among them to C and acquired the remaining KRW 38.5 million.

around 18:45 on March 5, 2016, the Defendant driven a coo vehicle in K in the front parking lot of “J cafeteria” located in the wife population I, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.122% during blood, at approximately 3 meters.

Summary of Evidence

" 2016 Gohap 298"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. C Complaints;

1. Copy of the sentence of 2015 High Court Decision 163, 2015 High Court and copy of the sentence of 2112, Seoul High Court;

1. Copies of A Interrogation Protocol 2015, 163 Gohap 2016, 320;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. L.C.