1. The Defendant’s enforcement against the Plaintiff is based on the payment order of this Court 2016 tea455.

In light of the fact that: (a) the instant court’s 2006 Ghana7456 case was proceeding by public notice; and (b) the Plaintiff was unaware of the fact that the said lawsuit was filed and the judgment became final and conclusive at the time when the Plaintiff filed the application for immunity with the Seoul Central District Court on July 7, 2008 pursuant to the Seoul Central District Court (2008), the Plaintiff’s responsibilities owed to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant prepared a receipt certificate with C on December 24, 2002 that the obligation of the Plaintiff was terminated with C; and (d) it is difficult to find special reasons to omit only the obligation to the Defendant while filing the application for immunity; and (e) it is difficult to find that the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone was not sufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff had known that the instant obligation existed at the time of the application for immunity

Therefore, since the plaintiff's obligation of this case is exempted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 566 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, it is so decided as per Disposition.