logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2006. 08. 11. 선고 2006가단34445 판결
사해행위[국승]
Title

Fraudulent Act

Summary

Whether it constitutes a fraudulent act where a delinquent taxpayer completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant real estate in the future of the defendant who is his spouse.

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act Cancellation of Speculative Acts

Text

1. The sales contract concluded on October 25, 2005 between the defendant and Cho ○○ shall be revoked.

2. The defendant will implement the procedure for the cancellation registration of transfer of ownership, which was completed on November 25, 2005 by the ○○ District Court ○○○○ registry office ○○ with respect to the real estate stated in the separate sheet, and completed on November 25, 2005.

3. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

1. Indication of claim: A claim seeking the cancellation of the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground that the sales contract concluded on October 25, 2005 on October 25, 2005 with respect to the real estate in the attached Form between the defendant and Cho ○○ constitutes a fraudulent act and subsequent restitution of ownership transfer registration on the ground that it constitutes a fraudulent act.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow