Defendant

In two years of imprisonment for A and B, Defendant C’s imprisonment for one year and two months, Defendant D’s imprisonment for 10 months, and Defendant E.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 18, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and seven hundred thousand won of a fine at the Daegu District Court due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, etc.) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daegu Detention Center on August 20, 2013.

Defendant

B On July 24, 2014, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapon, etc.), the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for eight months was finalized on November 11, 2014. On October 2, 2014, the Daegu District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Daegu District Court. The above judgment became final and conclusive on October 11, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The fraud P, while residing in China, conspiredd with many unspecified victims in order to perform the role of: (a) the total liability of the telephone financial fraud organization (hereinafter “scaming”) that leads to the occurrence of credit loans, etc., or misrepresentation of financial resources by deceiving employees of the Financial Supervisory Service; (b) the role of the Defendant A to recruit withdrawals at the request of P to introduce persons who will participate in the scaming from P; (c) the role of Defendant B receiving reports on its activities; (d) the role of Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F to offer withdrawals at the direction of Defendant A and report their activities to Defendant A; and (e) the role of Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant E, and Defendant F, Defendant F, the cash withdrawal and delivery of the criminal organization of Boscing

Accordingly, at around 08:00 on December 4, 2014, 201, the Defendant sent a false statement to Qu Q Q who did not have any intent to safely keep the victim’s money, and “I would like to recover the money in cash to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service sent by us by withdrawing the money from the passbook because the personal information was leaked.”

(vi)bed;