logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단2528
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2017, the Defendant, at the bus stops in front of the D Station Spaneng-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul on March 18:30, 2017, was spared with the victim E (V, 23 years old), the male-gu, and, at the bus stops, deemed to have been employed by young young children.

The term “indecent act” refers to “a indecent act committed by the victim with his her her son’s son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Determination as to the defendant and defense counsel's respective legal statements of witness E, F, G and H

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant is able to contact the victim's body while he was punished by the victim's male-friendly job offer F and vagabonds, but he intentionally does not have her her but her her her her her sent.

2. Determination

A. In determining the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. supporting the facts charged, the court shall assess the credibility of the statements, taking into account all the circumstances that make it difficult to record in the witness examination protocol, including the appearance and attitude of the witness, and the penance of the statements made by the witness in the open court after taking an oath before a judge, as well as whether the statements made by the victim, etc. conform to the rationality, logic, contradiction, or rule of experience in the statement itself, or those made by the third party, and whether the statements made by the witness, including the victims, are consistent with the facts charged. The court shall not dismiss them without permission unless there is any separate evidence that can objectively deem the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc., objectively and objectively (see Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). Moreover, considering the following circumstances, the credibility of the statements made by the witness examination protocol, including the statement made in the open court after taking an oath before a judge, it shall not be denied without permission for the following reasons.

arrow