1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,876,400 as well as 5% per annum from December 17, 2014 to October 25, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Details of the public works - Project name: B (III): Project operator: Defendant - Project approval: Ministry of Knowledge Economy on February 20, 2012;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on October 23, 2014 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”): The object of compensation: the amount indicated below [Attachment Table] in the column of “adjudication of expropriation” in the following [Attachment Table].

- Certified public appraisal corporations: Samil Certified public appraisal corporations, stock corporations;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection on July 16, 2015 (hereinafter “the ruling”) - Contents of the ruling: Change of the amount of compensation for losses in the amount indicated below [the statement of compensation] into the amount indicated below [the statement of compensation].

- An appraisal corporation: A new appraisal corporation in the future of a corporation and a virtual appraisal corporation;

D. As a result of the commission of appraisal by a public appraisal corporation and an appraiser F (hereinafter “court appraiser”) to a public appraisal corporation in the instant court (hereinafter “court appraisal”): The amount of appraisal is as stated below in the “court appraisal amount” column in the following [the statement of compensation].

[Attachment Table of Compensation] (The original unit: D 273,457,500 273,343,500 279,100,50,500 Sung-gu E 50,431,431,486,600 52,606,000 323,888,500 324,830,830,310 31,706,500 / The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence, Eul's evidence, Eul's evidence 1 through 7, the result of the court's appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) As to the instant ruling and the court’s appraiser and relevant case (Seoul District Court 2014Guhap23446), the court’s appraiser and the relevant case are the same comparable G land (hereinafter “non-standard land”).

In calculating the other factors correction of H land, the case of H land transaction has been selected at the same time, and among them the conditions of access.