Defendants are not guilty.

1. The facts charged of this case [the facts of the background] suggested to the effect that Defendant B, around January 1, 2006, frequently coming into and out of the G where he was in his own possession, proposed to the effect that “the victim would preserve the victim as it is after securing the business compensation under the I development that would have the victim would receive in the manner of pretending to have a claim for the borrowed amount to be repaid from the injured party, and then make it safe to the injured party,” and that Defendant B received three copies of a false loan certificate under the name of the injured party A (i.e., ① 26 million won as of April 9, 2004; ② a certificate of deposit of the fake cash deposit of KRW 50 million as of June 15, 2004; ③ a certificate of deposit of the fake cash deposit of KRW 15 million as of May 18, 2005; and ③ a certificate of deposit of the cash of KRW 10 million as of May 18, 2005).

On September 25, 2006, the Daejeon District Court issued on September 25, 2006 a payment order for KRW 91 million to Defendant A by the court of the Daejeon District Court of Hongsung Branch, which issued a payment order for KRW 90,000,00 to Defendant A on the basis of Chapter 3 of the false loan certificate in custody. The above payment order was finalized on October 12 of the same year.

On January 24, 2007, the Defendants received a seizure and collection order as to the operating compensation claims under the I tourist resort development project for the I tourist resort development project for the time when the injured party was designated as the creditor from the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court on January 24, 2007. The Defendants knew of the above payment order and the seizure and collection order of the above bonds were to be applied to Defendant B as the "K cafeteria" operated by the J, which was operated by Defendant B, when the service place of the above bonds and the collection order was made by Defendant B. On June 7, 2008, the Defendants knew that the victim was not aware of the above fact that the above payment order and the seizure and collection order had been made to Defendant A around the 9th of the same month, and had withdrawn the above seizure and collection order around the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 15, 2013, the fraud Defendants due to seizure of corporeal movables are based on false claims equivalent to KRW 91 million of principal as above.