logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.06.19 2015가합255
투자금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. 1) On February 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim for damages based on a tort with a vegetable employee, via a vegetable employee, as an expert in the boiler field. At the time, the Defendant was placed with a vegetable employee’s name as the C boiler patent (hereinafter “instant patent”).

(2) The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff established a boiler supply business using the patent of this case to jointly operate the boiler supply business using the patent of this case and invested KRW 100 million in total of 137,194,200 to the boiler business. However, at the time of the preparation of the investment agreement, the patent of this case was applied in the name of the Defendant, not the Defendant, but the Defendant applied in the name of the company to which the Defendant would belong, and there was a number of patents similar to the patent of this case, and there was no possibility of supplying boiler to the Pacific farm. As seen earlier, the Defendant, by deceiving the Plaintiff as well as the Defendant, made an investment in the boiler supply business using the patent of this case to jointly operate the boiler supply business using the patent of this case, and, if the Plaintiff invested in KRW 100,00,00,000, the Defendant was obligated to pay damages for delay damages to the Plaintiff due to 137,194,204,200,000 won or more.

2. Determination

A. Claims for damages arising from tort are filed.

arrow