logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.12 2014가합6828
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 15, 2012, the Defendant was established on February 15, 2012, and operated as “C”, and changed into the trade name as of September 3, 2014.

B. On March 16, 2012, the Defendant entered into a direct purchase contract between the Plaintiff’s introduction and the Plaintiff on a lot shopping company, which provides coffee products, etc. by selling them in the lot box operated by the said lot shopping company.

Paragraph 1 of the contract for the sale of lots: A.S. shall pay 30% of the total monthly sales amount sold in lot cards to A.S., who had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had

Paragraph 2 of the contract: Fee determined by the Barun in the payment of 30% of the above monthly total sales amount, and the distribution expenses paid to each sales store from the Logistics Center and the sales amount paid to the Barun shall be directly approved by the Dispute Settlement Bank D, and the remainder of the distribution (hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract amount”) shall be paid to A.

(The date of payment shall be the same as the date of payment of fees): This contract shall be valid only until the sale of the goods and the retirement of the goods.

Contract 4: In the event that the contract violates the provisions of paragraphs (1), (2) and (3), A shall pay Agreg the total sales amount, excluding the fee, to Agreg.

Section 5: All powers other than the Nim may not be held (sales management, commodity management, sales management, event management, and other) and the next lot and business shall be conducted in consultation with the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. If the contract violates paragraph 5, this contract shall also be null and void.

C. On March 23, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant under which the Plaintiff would be paid 30% of the total monthly sales amount in return for the Plaintiff’s sales of the Defendant by selling it in a slot boat (hereinafter “instant contract”). The main contents are as follows.

The defendant was assigned a code No. E from July 2012 to sold it in a lot, and he is in Papua New Airport.

arrow